Archive for the ‘SSP’ Category

A Smart Pipe Manifesto   1 comment

Auctions conducted—impression by impression—inside of 125 milliseconds.

Real time bidding (RTB) holds the promise of making our digital plumbing smart—solving major challenges around media, audience and data fragmentation. But in practice, despite all the promises, and despite all the actually capabilities, most of the time we still have a dumb pipe.

But the market is about to bifurcate—to the supply (RTB Exchanges) and demand sources (Ad Networks, DSPs and Agency Trading Desks) that make the leap to what I call “smart pipe” and to those that get left behind with a “dumb pipe” approach.

For all the talk, many implementations of RTB and the ad technology stack today result in the equivalent of running glorified re-targeting ad networks—user targeting across dark pools of inventory—or other situations that are only marginally better.

For all the press releases and sponsored iMedia presentations proclaiming the newest capabilities, the truth is the ad technology stack is super complicated and it takes both good intentions and coordinated work up and down the supply chain—publisher, RTB supply, RTB buyer, ad servers, ad creative producers—to deliver a smart pipe. Way too much exchange traded media gets lost in a sea of iFrames, entering a vast black hole that drives down its value for both the brand (ex.: I care about environment and audience) and the direct response (ex.: I care about ones and zeros—data to optimize) buyer.

Who is culpable in regards to our industry’s dumb pipe syndrome?

There is plenty of blame to hand out:

  1. Publishers need to work with exchanges to provide a clear view into the source of the impression.
  2. Exchanges need to pass this transparency along with data about the page, ad slot and user to its bidders to provide the greatest liquidity and demand for each impression.
  3. RTB Buyers (ad networks, DSPs) must accept and consume this data to create value by offering advanced targeting, optimization and reporting/insights.
  4. Agency Trading Desks and operating agencies need to develop & expand the workforce that can utilize this value; must be able to explain and convey this value to clients and must capture client budget that is about media investment not only cost reduction.
  5. Clients need to demand smart solutions and put their money where their mouth is. Programmatic buying can deliver a full suite of value from direct response to brand—clients need to understand, demand and fund these smart pipe capabilities when working with their suppliers.

Everyone in the supply chain has a job to do to deliver the smart pipe and some companies are further along than others. Anyone in this supply chain can drop in one or two Iframes, or not catch and pass along an important piece of data, and there is diminished value for everyone.

The good news is many in the ad tech stack are stepping up. In addition to specific company-to-company cooperation, initiatives through the IAB Networks & Exchanges committee and OpenRTB will assist in facilitating the smart pipe approach.

I declare 2012 the year of the SMART PIPE!

Posted September 19, 2011 by jaysears in CONTEXTWEB, Google, RTB, SSP

Tagged with , , ,

SSPs Are Dead. Admeld, Pubmatic, Rubicon – All Dead   3 comments

SSPs are Dead.

Admeld. Dead.

Pubmatic. Dead.

Rubicon. Dead.

Niedermeyer. Dead. (anyone?)

SSPs are Dead

SSPs (supply side platforms) began to emerge in 2007 to help large publishers “YIELD OPTIMIZE” demand from ad networks—all 400 of them.

It was a great pitch: Mr. Big Publisher, you utilize 20-70% of your inventory to make 80% of your revenue from direct sales. Let me manage all the second channel (remnant) demand via ad networks—you’ll make more because I the SSP know how to “YIELD OPTIMIZE” among this crazy world of 400 ad networks.

The YIELD OPTIMIZATION business—the reason for the creation of SSPs—is Dead. Finito. Over.

Ben, Rajeev, Frank—before you lunge for the phone (or lunge at me), I’m actually going to explain to everyone your bright future. Bankers please get your pencils ready.

SSPs are now Exchanges. There has been a buzz word merger. Someone tell Terry Kawaja so he can adjust his bubble chart (bubble chart, get it?).

Effective immediately all digital media executives are to cease and desist all usage of the acronym S.S.P. and use the fully formed noun “Exchange”.

Optimization has moved to the buy side.

Real Time Bidding enabled supply (otherwise known as Exchange) allows all RTB buyers—ad networks, DSPs, agency trading desks—to bring their own optimization to the table. RTB caused the death of SSPs and their emergence as exchanges.

In fact at a recent conference, Admeld’s own Ben Barokas said his business has shifted from 15% RTB/85% YIELD OPTIMIZATION in January 2010 to 54% RTB/46% YIELD OPTIMIZATION in January 2011. At best, yield optimization is a legacy business among SSPs.

OLD: SSPs
Admeld
Pubmatic
Rubicon

OLD: Exchanges
AdX (Google)
CONTEXTWEB
OpenX

NEW: Merger to Exchanges—all RTB Enabled
Admeld
AdX (Google)
CONTEXTWEB
OpenX
Pubmatic
Rubicon

Google did not buy Admeld the SSP for $400 million. Google bought Admeld the Exchange for $400 million.

See my earlier post Google, Admeld & The Need for Diabolical Liquidity.

What do you think? Leave a comment below or contact me.

[These views are my own. If you want to speak with CONTEXTWEB in regards to RTB, go here.]

Thanks to DOH for the movie reference.

Posted June 16, 2011 by jaysears in RTB, SSP

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,612 other followers